When the former AEL-president Dyab Abu Jahjah gave his bidding and consequently published a cartoon about the Holocaust these “enlightened” Western opinion molders became hysterical.
What surprised us most in this matter was the fact that the Arab reactions to the Danish cartoon-affair (aside from the sad burnings, boycotts and the like) without exception involved the hypocrisy of the West and its sacred Holocaust-dogmas in the West. Questioning the ‘Six Million Gassed Jews of Auschwitz and Everywhere’ implicates the severest form of persecution and state repression. At the moment the Canadian Ernst Zündel, the German Germar Rudolf, the Swiss René Berclaz, the Fleming Siegfried Verbeke, the Briton David Irving and tens of lesser gods from the revisionist pantheon remain locked up in state facilities. Their only crime is their different opinion about certain alleged aspects of the Second World War.
The West which on one side demonstrates the greatest tolerance – call it unwillingness – for recidivist and antisocial criminals such as thieves, rapists and murderers, doesn’t spare a chance to prosecute and silence the revisionist school and to bring them for an Inquisitional court.
Those Egyptian, Iranian, Syrian and Lebanese columnists in this matter clearly have a better understanding of the degree to which the free West allows itself to be tyrannized and paralyzed than the bunch of sociological and political experts who merely portray their hypocrisy over our democratic rights.
Worse is the fact that these international and mostly Arab commentators only see the tip of the iceberg. Aside from the open repression of the dissident revisionists and the institutionalized Freudian analytical lessons in state schools where Germans are branded as “culprits” from the cradle to the grave, we sadly see that the unmentionable, small and isolated cases of Holocaust exploitation lead to the gravest excesses.
And so we read in the Flemish daily De Standaard (02/03/2006) about the trial of an 80 year old man before a criminal court for charges of raping underage children. As with many trials of a certain sensitive nature, this one was also held behind closed doors. The reason for that appeared later on. In 2003 the defendant molested up to seven children near a swimming pool of a recreational domain and a play garden, seven children that were all under five years of age.
This serial child rapist received an absolute meager five years in jail. Five, that is about the average age of the children he raped and that will be emotionally and physically scarred for the rest of their lives. Five, even less than the amount of seven young children he raped. Belgium which internationally still is associated with the drama of 1996 and which is also internally struggling with a post-Dutroux complex (the serial pedophile who ran a prostitution ring) committed the worst imaginable public relations. Although the tolerance for pedophiles among magistrates and judges ended abruptly since Dutroux’ arrest, this 80 year old recidivistic child molester received an historically low sentence of five years. Thanks to the Lejeune-legislation he most probably will only have to spend one third of this sentence in a cell.
Then what is the reason that a recidivistic pedophile can account for so much goodwill? According to the defense the culprit is “traumatized” of his imprisonment at the Auschwitz concentration camp where he allegedly “had been tested on”. This completely prefabricated, fictitious account of an alleged treatment by the miracle doctor Mengele could only hail from the Holocaust mythomania of Lanzmann, Wiesenthal and others. The fact that a judge succumbed for this fabric of lies and clearly disregarded the unmentionable suffering of these seven children, proves once more the thorough psychological tyranny and paralyzing of the West. Whoever mentions the magical code word “Holocaust” can account for the biggest, unconditional understanding. At the same time the most incompetent Belgian minister of foreign affairs, Karel De Gucht, felt the insatiable need to criticize the Iranian ambassador in Belgium for the Iranian tolerance of Holocaust revisionism and the promotion of anti-Zionism. That is the psychologically disturbed and mentally colonized West the Arab commentators should be criticizing whenever a Western country insults them.
Apart from the dozens of imprisoned revisionists we can observe an ever larger plague coming over our heads: the conditioned Pavlovian reaction of Westerners whenever a mythomanical Jew brings up the Holohoax and thus all rationale must be abandoned. A serial child molester will be free again in one and a half years, while his victims will bear the scars for a lifetime. The quest for justice in the West colonized by Zionists seems a task for Sisyphus.
Armin Müller.